Comments on: Content Labels can resolve Viacom vs Google issue http://segala.com/blog/content-labels-can-resolve-viacom-vs-google-issue/ Enabling a Reliable, Consistent and Trusted Experience Tue, 06 Jan 2009 21:34:38 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2 By: links for 2007-03-21 at Wired Gecko http://segala.com/blog/content-labels-can-resolve-viacom-vs-google-issue/#comment-4735 links for 2007-03-21 at Wired Gecko Wed, 21 Mar 2007 05:26:12 +0000 http://segala.com/blog/content-labels-can-resolve-viacom-vs-google-issue/#comment-4735 [...] Content Labels can resolve Viacom vs Google issue (tags: contentlabels semanticweb segala viacom google) [...] [...] Content Labels can resolve Viacom vs Google issue (tags: contentlabels semanticweb segala viacom google) [...]

]]> By: Paul Walsh http://segala.com/blog/content-labels-can-resolve-viacom-vs-google-issue/#comment-4571 Paul Walsh Tue, 20 Mar 2007 15:28:57 +0000 http://segala.com/blog/content-labels-can-resolve-viacom-vs-google-issue/#comment-4571 Regarding my last comment, it is of course intended to be a little funny and not overly confident. It's just great to see use cases come up for which we can offer a solution... :) Regarding my last comment, it is of course intended to be a little funny and not overly confident. It’s just great to see use cases come up for which we can offer a solution… :)

]]> By: Paul Walsh http://segala.com/blog/content-labels-can-resolve-viacom-vs-google-issue/#comment-4570 Paul Walsh Tue, 20 Mar 2007 15:25:22 +0000 http://segala.com/blog/content-labels-can-resolve-viacom-vs-google-issue/#comment-4570 Mark - thanks for stopping by. <blockquote>the third time that Segala has come to my attention in a week in connection with ACAP</blockquote> may I ask who the culprits are? :) <blockquote>...until we have completed our requirements work"</blockquote> after the work we've already done (outside of POWDER) I can tell you what your requirements should be ;) Reading your Web site regarding your goals, I can tell you that Content Labels will do everything you want and stuff you haven't even thought about yet! Mark - thanks for stopping by.

the third time that Segala has come to my attention in a week in connection with ACAP

may I ask who the culprits are? :)

…until we have completed our requirements work”

after the work we’ve already done (outside of POWDER) I can tell you what your requirements should be ;) Reading your Web site regarding your goals, I can tell you that Content Labels will do everything you want and stuff you haven’t even thought about yet!

]]> By: Mark Bide http://segala.com/blog/content-labels-can-resolve-viacom-vs-google-issue/#comment-4505 Mark Bide Tue, 20 Mar 2007 08:50:41 +0000 http://segala.com/blog/content-labels-can-resolve-viacom-vs-google-issue/#comment-4505 Paul: I am writing as the Project Coordinator of ACAP. I was delighted to have been introduced to you by email; this is (you will be pleased to hear) the third time that Segala has come to my attention in a week in connection with ACAP. ACAP is entirely committed to the principle that we will not reinvent anything unnecessarily. On the other hand, until we have completed our requirements work, it would be entirely inappropriate for us to commit to use any particular technical solution. POWDER was already on our radar, and will continue to be so. I look forward to meeting you (before too long, I hope) so that we can continue our discussions face-to-face Mark Paul:

I am writing as the Project Coordinator of ACAP. I was delighted to have been introduced to you by email; this is (you will be pleased to hear) the third time that Segala has come to my attention in a week in connection with ACAP.

ACAP is entirely committed to the principle that we will not reinvent anything unnecessarily. On the other hand, until we have completed our requirements work, it would be entirely inappropriate for us to commit to use any particular technical solution. POWDER was already on our radar, and will continue to be so.

I look forward to meeting you (before too long, I hope) so that we can continue our discussions face-to-face

Mark

]]>