<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Enabling more trustworthy relevant and reliable search</title>
	<atom:link href="http://segala.com/blog/enabling-more-trustworthy-relevant-and-reliable-search/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://segala.com/blog/enabling-more-trustworthy-relevant-and-reliable-search/</link>
	<description>Enabling a Reliable, Consistent and Trusted Experience</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 21:22:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: cimota&#124;atomic &#187; And the winner is&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://segala.com/blog/enabling-more-trustworthy-relevant-and-reliable-search/#comment-140634</link>
		<dc:creator>cimota&#124;atomic &#187; And the winner is&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 08:27:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://segala.com/blog/enabling-more-trustworthy-relevant-and-reliable-search/#comment-140634</guid>
		<description>[...] Reading the Segala blog on enabling more trustworthy, relevant and reliable search, I&#8217;d think that was a worthy way for Google to combat Facebook. (I&#8217;ve never spoken to Paul @ Segala but I&#8217;m sure he&#8217;d like $240 million!) Remembering that Facebook is very much a walled garden at the moment (you can put your data in but you can&#8217;t get it out -not quite true, but still ) and attempts to retrieve data have found some companies getting a kick in the nads and told to eff off. Facebook wants to own the data, thanks, so please stop doing that and use the limited APIs we&#8217;ve provided. Or we&#8217;ll kill you. (and we have £240 million dollars with which to buy hit-men). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Reading the Segala blog on enabling more trustworthy, relevant and reliable search, I&#8217;d think that was a worthy way for Google to combat Facebook. (I&#8217;ve never spoken to Paul @ Segala but I&#8217;m sure he&#8217;d like $240 million!) Remembering that Facebook is very much a walled garden at the moment (you can put your data in but you can&#8217;t get it out -not quite true, but still ) and attempts to retrieve data have found some companies getting a kick in the nads and told to eff off. Facebook wants to own the data, thanks, so please stop doing that and use the limited APIs we&#8217;ve provided. Or we&#8217;ll kill you. (and we have £240 million dollars with which to buy hit-men). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
